From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunlap v. Norton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jul 20, 1915
150 P. 1029 (Okla. 1915)

Opinion

No. 4516

Opinion Filed July 20, 1915.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal — Failure to File Brief. Where plaintiff in error does not file brief within the time allowed by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix), nor before case is due to be taken on submission, the appeal will be treated as abandoned, and dismissed.

(Syllabus by Thacker, C.)

Error from County Court, Seminole County; T.S. Cobb, Judge.

Action by Sam Norton, as plaintiff, against. Charles Dunlap, as defendant. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error. Dismissed.

J.A. Baker, for plaintiff in error.

Crump, Fowler Skinner, for defendant in error.


On October 31, 1912, the case-made was filed in this court, on July 13, 1915, this case was due to be taken on submission, but the plaintiff in error has wholly failed to file briefs, as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix), and has thus abandoned the appeal.

We are, therefore, of the opinion that the case should be treated as abandoned and dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Dunlap v. Norton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jul 20, 1915
150 P. 1029 (Okla. 1915)
Case details for

Dunlap v. Norton

Case Details

Full title:DUNLAP v. NORTON

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jul 20, 1915

Citations

150 P. 1029 (Okla. 1915)
150 P. 1029

Citing Cases

State v. Gomer

It is pointed out in 46 Corpus Juris, 1070, section 402, that "a bond conditioned on the faithful performance…

McCrory v. Bd. of Commissioners of Woods County

The sureties insist that the statute fixes the salary which their principal, the county attorney, was…