From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duncan v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Oct 14, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:19-CV-1333-S-BH (N.D. Tex. Oct. 14, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:19-CV-1333-S-BH

10-14-2020

TIGEST DAWN DUNCAN, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are adopted. Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.

SO ORDERED.

SIGNED October 14, 2020.

/s/ _________

KAREN GREN SCHOLER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Duncan v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Oct 14, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:19-CV-1333-S-BH (N.D. Tex. Oct. 14, 2020)
Case details for

Duncan v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:TIGEST DAWN DUNCAN, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Oct 14, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:19-CV-1333-S-BH (N.D. Tex. Oct. 14, 2020)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Kijakazi

See Veal v. Soc. Sec. Admin., 618 F.Supp.2d 600, 608 (E.D. Tex. 2009). The DOT and the SCO “comprise a…

Pitts v. Saul

Because the ALJ relied on the VE's testimony that jobs "exist in significant numbers in the national economy…