From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunagan v. Thornton

Oregon Supreme Court
Apr 22, 1964
391 P.2d 783 (Or. 1964)

Opinion

Argued April 17, 1964

Ballot title approved April 22, 1964

Appeal from Ballot Title certified by Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General.

BALLOT TITLE APPROVED.

Glen McCarty, Portland, filed a brief for appellant.

Theodore W. de Looze, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General, Salem.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN and DENECKE, Justices.


IN BANC


The petitioner being dissatisfied with the ballot title provided by the Attorney General for an initiative measure filed with the Secretary of State has appealed to this court by a petition praying for a different title.

It appears that on February 28, 1964 a petition for an initiative measure to be referred to the people of the state was filed with the Secretary of State, and that on March 11, 1964 the Attorney General returned the following ballot title therefor:

BALLOT TITLE

"Sales, School Tax Limitation Constitutional Amendment.

Purpose: Fixes limit on sales/use tax at 3 percent. Exempts foodstuffs, drugs, raw materials. Establishes formulas for income, school tax relief. Limits school tax levies."

Petitioner contends that the ballot title provided by the Attorney General is insufficient, unfair and misleading, and does not give a true and impartial statement of the purpose of the measure as required by ORS 254.070. In her brief petitioner also questions the constitutionality of the proposed measure, but that question is not within the scope of review authorized in these matters by ORS 254.080. See also Johnson v. City of Astoria, 227 Or. 585, 591, 363 P.2d 571 (1961).

ORS 254.080. "* * * Upon appeal the Supreme Court shall examine the measure, hear arguments and in its decision certify to the Secretary of State a ballot title for the measure in accord with the intent of ORS 254.060 to 254.080. * * *"

After examining the measure, the ballot title prepared by the Attorney General, and the petition and briefs, and hearing the argument of the respondents, we conclude that the ballot title provided by the Attorney General complies with ORS 254.070, and the same is hereby approved and certified to the Secretary of State as the ballot title for the measure.


Summaries of

Dunagan v. Thornton

Oregon Supreme Court
Apr 22, 1964
391 P.2d 783 (Or. 1964)
Case details for

Dunagan v. Thornton

Case Details

Full title:DUNAGAN v. THORNTON ET AL

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Apr 22, 1964

Citations

391 P.2d 783 (Or. 1964)
391 P.2d 783

Citing Cases

Nearman v. Rosenblum

Id. at 277, 882 P.2d 588. It followed, the petitioner argued, that the measure violated the Supremacy Clause…

Nearman v. Rosenblum

It followed, the petitioner argued, that the measure violated the Supremacy Clause of the United States…