From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duke Energy Corp. v. Malcolm

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 15, 2006
361 N.C. 111 (N.C. 2006)

Opinion

No. 379A06.

December 15, 2006.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 178 N.C. App. 62, 630 S.E.2d 693 (2006), affirming in part and reversing in part a judgment entered 14 December 2004 by Judge James E. Lanning in Superior Court, Mecklenburg County. Heard in the Supreme Court 22 November 2006.

Parker Poe Adams Bernstein LLP, by Irvin W. Hankins III and John W. Francisco, for plaintiff-appellee. Ferguson, Scarbrough Hayes, PA., by James E. Scarbrough, for defendant-appellant Malcolm. Kilpatrick Stockton LLP, by James H. Kelly, Jr. and Noelle E. Wooten, for defendant-appellant Callabridge/Granite, LLC.


AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Duke Energy Corp. v. Malcolm

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 15, 2006
361 N.C. 111 (N.C. 2006)
Case details for

Duke Energy Corp. v. Malcolm

Case Details

Full title:DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION, A NORTH CAROLINA CORPORATION, TAX IDENTIFICATION…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 15, 2006

Citations

361 N.C. 111 (N.C. 2006)

Citing Cases

Webb v. Hardy

Further, the evidence presented by the parties must be viewed in the light most favorable to the non-movant.’…

Wachovia Bank v. Superior Construction

Glover v. First Union National Bank, 109 N.C. App. 451, 456, 428 S.E.2d 206, 209 (1993) (citing St. Paul Fire…