From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duggan v. D.C

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
May 9, 2002
797 A.2d 1233 (D.C. 2002)

Opinion

No. 98-CV-199, CA11686-94

Filed May 9, 2002

BEFORE: *Wagner, Chief Judge; Terry, Steadman, Schwelb, Farrell, *Ruiz, Reid, Glickman, and Washington, Associate Judges; *Belson, Senior Judge.


ORDER


On consideration of appellee's petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc, the appendix, and appellants' opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED by the merits division* that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellee's petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of October 11, 2001, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the calendar permits. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall simultaneously file new briefs on or before June 10, 2002, and shall file responsive briefs no later than July 1, 2002. Each party shall file ten copies of its briefs. These new briefs shall be specifically designed for consideration by and addressed to the en banc court and shall supersede all briefs previously filed in this appeal. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that any requests for extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and will be granted only upon a showing of good cause.


Summaries of

Duggan v. D.C

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
May 9, 2002
797 A.2d 1233 (D.C. 2002)
Case details for

Duggan v. D.C

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA DUGGAN, ET AL., Appellants v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: May 9, 2002

Citations

797 A.2d 1233 (D.C. 2002)

Citing Cases

Duggan v. District of Columbia

The court concluded, in part, that "a rational juror could reasonably have found the police officer grossly…