Opinion
February 2, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Siracuse, J.
Present — Denman, P.J., Green, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff struck his head on a ceiling joist while walking on a plywood platform atop a scaffold, causing him to fall to the plywood platform. Supreme Court properly granted that portion of defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action. Plaintiff's injury did not "directly flow from the application of the force of gravity to an object or person" (Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co., 81 N.Y.2d 494, 501). The risk of walking into a low ceiling joist is a risk wholly unrelated to elevation differentials (see, Bonaparte v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 188 A.D.2d 853, appeal dismissed 81 N.Y.2d 1067). The court properly denied that portion of defendant's motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the Labor Law § 241 (6) cause of action. Defendant failed to show that the lighting in the area where plaintiff was working was sufficient to meet the standard set forth in 12 NYCRR 23-1.30. Thus, defendant failed to meet its burden of coming forward with proof in evidentiary form establishing that the cause of action has no merit; that failure requires denial of the motion, regardless of the sufficiency of the opposing papers (see, McGowan v. Villa Maria Coll., 185 A.D.2d 674; Larkin Trucking Co. v. Lisbon Tire Mart, 185 A.D.2d 614, 615; see also, Wallace v. Parks Corp., 212 A.D.2d 132, 139).