From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dudrey v. Equitable Life Assu. Socy. of U.S.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 17, 1939
170 Misc. 418 (N.Y. App. Term 1939)

Opinion

February 17, 1939.

Appeal from the City Court of the City of New York, Bronx County.

Thomson McGinty [ E.V. Conwell of counsel], for the appellant.

Alexander Green [ James D. Ewing of counsel], for the respondent.

John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General [ Henry Epstein, Solicitor-General, and John F.X. McGohey, Assistant Attorney-General, of counsell, appearing for the Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York as amici curiae.


In view of the provisions of subdivision 1 of section 101-a and of subdivision 6 of section 101-b Ins. of the Insurance Law, it was unlawful for the defendant, in issuing a policy of group life insurance, to attempt to exclude from the coverage of the policy employees over a certain age. The case not being one of those specified in subdivision 2 of section 101-a of said statute the company was obliged to insure either all of the employees of the employer or else all employees of a class "determined by conditions pertaining to the employment." The age of an employee is not a "condition pertaining to the employment," but rather a condition pertaining to the employee himself.

The provisions attempting to limit the coverage of the policy to employees below a certain age must accordingly be disregarded. It follows that plaintiff is entitled to judgment on the pleadings. Under the provisions of its policy defendant is at most entitled to an offset for the amount of premiums which should have been paid had the age of plaintiff's deceased husband been correctly stated. The policy provides for an adjustment of the premium and not of the amount of insurance as it could have done under the provisions of subdivision 3 of section 101-b Ins. of the Insurance Law. No such offset has been pleaded, defendant, in addition to denials, relying only on a complete defense based upon the age of plaintiff's husband.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with leave to serve an amended answer within six days after service of order entered hereon, on payment of costs, with leave to appeal to the Appellate Division.

All concur. Present — HAMMER, SHIENTAG and NOONAN, JJ.


Summaries of

Dudrey v. Equitable Life Assu. Socy. of U.S.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 17, 1939
170 Misc. 418 (N.Y. App. Term 1939)
Case details for

Dudrey v. Equitable Life Assu. Socy. of U.S.

Case Details

Full title:LILLIAN DUDREY, Appellant, v. THE EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY OF THE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Feb 17, 1939

Citations

170 Misc. 418 (N.Y. App. Term 1939)
10 N.Y.S.2d 639

Citing Cases

Simmons v. Continental Casualty Company

Although somewhat obscure, the Court understands plaintiffs to cite the case of Dudrey v. Equitable Life…

Mahone v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co.

See 36 O.S.Supp. 1975 § 4101.[ 36-4101] . [ 36-4101].) Appellant contends that the master policy here in…