Opinion
October 10, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.).
Ordered that the appeals from the orders dated August 17, 1992, and May 2, 1994, are dismissed as superseded by a judgment in this action dated May 23, 1994; and it is further,
Ordered that the appeal from the order dated February 3, 1993, is dismissed as superseded by judgments dated June 16, 1993, and May 23, 1994; and it is further,
Ordered that the appeal from the order dated April 2, 1993, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,
Ordered that the order dated December 1, 1993, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,
Ordered that the judgment dated June 16, 1993, is affirmed for reasons stated by Justice Vinik at the Supreme Court; and it is further,
Ordered that the nonparty respondent is awarded one bill of costs.
We note that by decision and order of this Court dated January 5, 1995, the plaintiff's appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 23, 1994, was dismissed for failure to timely perfect the appeal in accordance with the rules of this Court. Thereafter, by order dated August 4, 1995, this Court held that any issues raised by the plaintiff on the instant appeals which relate to the judgment dated May 23, 1994, would not be considered.
The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in permanently restraining the plaintiff from making any further motions relating to the nonparty respondent without the court's prior permission.
Nor did the court err in adjudicating the plaintiff in civil contempt for her failure to submit to an examination as a judgment debtor (see, Great Neck Pennysaver v. Central Nassau Publs., 65 A.D.2d 616).
The parties' remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J.P., Hart, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.