From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dubois v. Wilkes-Barre

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 19, 1963
410 Pa. 155 (Pa. 1963)

Opinion

January 18, 1963.

March 19, 1963.

Negligence — Municipalities — Public sidewalk — Slippery substance on sidewalk — Cause of pedestrian's fall — Failure of Proof.

In an action of trespass to recover damages from a fall on a public sidewalk, allegedly caused by the existence of an accumulation of melted ice cream and grease thereon, in which the plaintiff did not prove what caused her to fall, it was Held that the court below had properly entered a compulsory nonsuit.

Before BELL, C. J., MUSMANNO, COHEN, EAGEN, O'BRIEN and ROBERTS, JJ.

Appeal, No. 275, Jan. T., 1962, from judgment of Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County, Dec. T., 1959, No. 1204, in case of Grace Dubois v. City of Wilkes-Barre, James F. Poland and Melvin Mosier, trading as The Forty Fort Ice Cream Company. Judgment affirmed.

Trespass for personal injuries. Before LEWIS, J.

Compulsory nonsuit entered against plaintiff, plaintiff's rule to lift compulsory nonsuit discharged and judgment entered. Plaintiff appealed.

Arthur Piccone, with him Raymond F. Lowery, for appellant.

E. C. Marianelli, for City of Wilkes-Barre, appellee.

John A. Gallagher, for appellee.

John L. McDonald, for appellee.


Plaintiff sued for injuries, suffered from a fall on a public sidewalk, allegedly caused by the existence of an accumulation of melted ice cream and grease thereon. The trial judge entered a compulsory nonsuit, which the court en banc refused to disturb. Plaintiff appeals.

The action of the court below was correct. The plaintiff's testimony failed to establish what caused her to fall. In order to establish liability in an action of this nature, it is necessary for the plaintiff to prove what actually caused the accident, not what might possibly have caused it. The jury cannot be allowed to guess that the fall resulted from the existence of a foreign substance on the sidewalk. See, Sellers v. Cline, 160 Pa. Super. 85, 49 A.2d 873 (1946); Rogers v. S. Phila. Nat'l Bank, 160 Pa. Super. 154, 50 A.2d 697 (1947); Hillelson v. Renner, 183 Pa. Super. 148, 130 A.2d 212 (1957); Burns v. City of Pitts., 320 Pa. 92, 181 A. 487 (1935); Rinaldi v. Levine, 406 Pa. 74, 176 A.2d 623 (1962); Gayne v. Philip Carey Co., 385 Pa. 618, 123 A.2d 432 (1956).

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Dubois v. Wilkes-Barre

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 19, 1963
410 Pa. 155 (Pa. 1963)
Case details for

Dubois v. Wilkes-Barre

Case Details

Full title:Dubois, Appellant, v. Wilkes-Barre

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 19, 1963

Citations

410 Pa. 155 (Pa. 1963)
189 A.2d 166

Citing Cases

Burke v. Leader Dogs for the Blind

Regrettably, the deposition testimony to which defendant adverted has not been docketed and made part of the…

Mohar v. Shawver

Simply put, Smith could not specify why or how Mohar fell, and Smith agreed that prior knowledge of Mohar's…