From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duart v. Department of Correction

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Oct 14, 2009
981 A.2d 1078 (Conn. 2009)

Opinion

Decided October 14, 2009


The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 116 Conn. App. 758 (AC 29994), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Whether the rule of Varley v. Varley, 180 Conn. 1, 428 A.2d 317 (1980), which requires a movant to demonstrate that the results at trial would have been different, applies to posttrial motions alleging knowing and deliberate discovery misconduct?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18476.

Leon M. Rosenblatt, in support of the petition.

Antoria D. Howard, assistant attorney general, in opposition.

NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

Duart v. Department of Correction

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Oct 14, 2009
981 A.2d 1078 (Conn. 2009)
Case details for

Duart v. Department of Correction

Case Details

Full title:BONNIE DUART v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Oct 14, 2009

Citations

981 A.2d 1078 (Conn. 2009)
981 A.2d 1078

Citing Cases

Simms v. Seaman

" See also Chapman Lumber, Inc. v. Tager, 288 Conn. 69, 107, 952 A.2d 1 (2008). In Billington v. Billington,…

Duart v. Dep't of Corr.

The issue certified stated: ''Whether the rule of Varley v. Varley, 180 Conn. 1, 428 A.2d 317 (1980), which…