holding that Congress did not intend to hold individual employees liable under Title VII
Summary of this case from Emmanuel v. Guam Seventh-Day Adventist ClinicNo. 96-1231.
June 27, 1997.
C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE O'CONNOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Reported below: 100 F. 3d 1061.
holding that Congress did not intend to hold individual employees liable under Title VII
Summary of this case from Emmanuel v. Guam Seventh-Day Adventist Clinicholding that Congress did not intend to hold individual employees liable under Title VII
Summary of this case from BLAS v. IMPERIAL SUITES, INC.holding that Congress did not intend to hold individual employees liable under Title VII
Summary of this case from Chatman v. Gentle Dental Center of WalthamFull title:E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS Co. v. SHERIDAN
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jun 27, 1997
By order dated October 1, 1997, this Court dismissed plaintiffs' Title VII claim against Rifice because there…
Blackshear v. City of WilmingtonThe ultimate issue in a Title VII case is whether the employer intentionally discriminated against the…