From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dryair 2000, Inc. v. Blue Winged Olive, L.L.C.

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga
Feb 7, 2009
No. 1:07-CV-22 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 7, 2009)

Opinion

No. 1:07-CV-22.

February 7, 2009


ORDER


Third-Party Plaintiff, Blue Winged Olive, LLC, d/b/a Servpro of North Chattanooga ("Servpro") filed a motion for default judgment (Court File No. 32), which the Court referred to United States Magistrate Judge William Carter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C) (Court File No. 33). In accordance with Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Judge Carter filed his report and recommendation recommending judgment be entered awarding Servpro $125,000 in damages against DryAir Gulf Coast, L.C., and James Gorab (Court File No. 41). No party filed an objection within the given ten days.

After reviewing the record, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. The Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the magistrate judge's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations pursuant to Section 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b).

Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 58(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court will set forth a separate document entering a judgment in favor of Servpro against DryAir Gulf Coast, L.C. and James Gorab.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dryair 2000, Inc. v. Blue Winged Olive, L.L.C.

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga
Feb 7, 2009
No. 1:07-CV-22 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 7, 2009)
Case details for

Dryair 2000, Inc. v. Blue Winged Olive, L.L.C.

Case Details

Full title:DRYAIR 2000, INC., Plaintiff, v. BLUE WINGED OLIVE, L.L.C., d/b/a, SERVPRO…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga

Date published: Feb 7, 2009

Citations

No. 1:07-CV-22 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 7, 2009)

Citing Cases

Selby v. Schroeder

To apply the place of performance for choice of law over the contract, "[t]he pertinent consideration is…

Prebul v. Bensusan (In re Prebul)

Although the bankruptcy court is correct that Appellants likely fail under either state's laws, the Court…