From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drunkovskis v. Meaux

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Dec 22, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-6112 (MLC) (D.N.J. Dec. 22, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-6112 (MLC)

12-22-2014

LAIMONIS DRUNKOVSKIS, Plaintiff, v. LEONARD G. MEAUX, et al., Defendants.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MEMORANDUM OPINION

THE PLAINTIFF brought this action in state court to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in a vehicular accident. (See dkt. entry no. 1-1, Compl.) The plaintiff named as defendants: (1) Leonard G. Meaux, also identified as Georgette M. Leonard ("Meaux"); (2) U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. ("USXE"); and (3) U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc. ("USXL"). (See dkt. entry no. 1, Notice of Removal 1-3.)

USXE AND USXL removed this action to this Court based on subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). (Id. at 2-3.)

BUT this removal is barred. USXE and USXL had to "obtain the unanimous consent of all defendants before seeking to remove the case to federal court". Step Plan Servs. v. Koresko, 219 Fed.Appx. 249, 250 (3d Cir. 2007) (explaining rule of unanimity); see First Am. Title Ins. Corp. v. JP Morgan Chase & Co., 384 Fed.Appx. 64, 66 (3d Cir. 2010) (stating "[r]emoval . . . requires unanimity among defendants"). USXE and USXL failed to obtain Meaux's consent to removal in writing.

THE COURT will therefore remand this action to state court. The Court will issue an appropriate order and judgment.

Meaux may attempt to timely remove this action from state court again with the written consent of USXE and USXL. See 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b); see also In re Diet Drugs, 282 F.3d 220, 232 n.8 (3d Cir. 2002) (stating "removal statute . . . does not categorically prohibit the filing of a second removal petition following remand"); Doe v. Am. Red Cross, 14 F.3d 196, 200 (3d Cir. 1993) (stating "nothing . . . prohibit[s] the filing of a second removal petition pursuant to Section 1446(b)"); C.S. v. Target Corp., No. 11-244, 2011 WL 915957, at *3 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 16, 2011) (stating "mere fact that a second (or third) notice of removal is filed does not appear to be dispositive").

s/ Mary L. Cooper

MARY L. COOPER

United States District Judge
Dated: December 22, 2014


Summaries of

Drunkovskis v. Meaux

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Dec 22, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-6112 (MLC) (D.N.J. Dec. 22, 2014)
Case details for

Drunkovskis v. Meaux

Case Details

Full title:LAIMONIS DRUNKOVSKIS, Plaintiff, v. LEONARD G. MEAUX, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Dec 22, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-6112 (MLC) (D.N.J. Dec. 22, 2014)