From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drummond v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Feb 24, 1982
628 S.W.2d 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. 002-82.

February 24, 1982.

Appeal from 221st Judicial District Court, Montgomery County; Lee Alsworth, J.

Ellis C. McCullough, Houston, Court-appointed, for appellant.

James H. Keeshan, Dist. Atty. and John D. MacDonald, II, Asst. Dist. Atty., Conroe, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before the court en banc.


OPINION ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW


This is an appeal from a conviction for the offense of murder. The jury assessed punishment at imprisonment in the Texas Department of Corrections for 99 years. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Drummond v. State, 624 S.W.2d 690 (Tex.App.-Beaumont, 1981).

In his petition for discretionary review, appellant complains of that portion of the opinion wherein the Court of Appeals stated: "We have carefully read the record containing the individual questioning of J.-R.- on the voir dire examination, and we do not find any such question being propounded." Our own examination of the record discloses that the prospective juror was specifically asked: "had you ever had a direct interest in the outcome of a criminal case?" The prospective juror then answered "no." We find that the Court of Appeals was incorrect with respect to this factual recitation in its opinion. However, we find that the correct result was reached.

Appellant's petition for discretionary review is refused.


Summaries of

Drummond v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Feb 24, 1982
628 S.W.2d 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 1982)
Case details for

Drummond v. State

Case Details

Full title:Robert Eugene DRUMMOND, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc

Date published: Feb 24, 1982

Citations

628 S.W.2d 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Penrice v. State

Veniremen Wishnow and Auclair were not subject to a challenge for cause on this contention. See Kennard v.…

Meeks v. State

If the evidence creates a fact issue, the witness may be an accomplice as a matter of fact and the issue…