From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drueding v. Devlin

U.S.
Mar 1, 1965
380 U.S. 125 (1965)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Drueding, the District Court tested the residency requirement there challenged by the equal-protection standard applied to ordinary state regulations: that is, restrictions need bear only some rational relationship to a legitimate end.

Summary of this case from Hall v. Beals
See 2 Summaries

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND.

No. 772.

Decided March 1, 1965.

234 F. Supp. 721, affirmed.

Lawrence Speiser, Allison W. Brown, Jr., and Edward L. Genn for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

Summaries of

Drueding v. Devlin

U.S.
Mar 1, 1965
380 U.S. 125 (1965)

In Drueding, the District Court tested the residency requirement there challenged by the equal-protection standard applied to ordinary state regulations: that is, restrictions need bear only some rational relationship to a legitimate end.

Summary of this case from Hall v. Beals

In Drueding v. Devlin, 380 U.S. 125, 85 S.Ct. 807, 13 L.Ed.2d 792 (1965), the Supreme Court summarily affirmed a district court decision upholding a one-year residency requirement which applied to presidential elections.

Summary of this case from Christopher v. Mitchell
Case details for

Drueding v. Devlin

Case Details

Full title:DRUEDING ET AL. v . DEVLIN ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 1, 1965

Citations

380 U.S. 125 (1965)

Citing Cases

Affeldt v. Whitcomb, (N.D.Ind. 1970)

Shapiro, supra 394 U.S. at 658, 89 S.Ct. 1322 (J. Harlan, J., dissenting). The standard by which a residency…

Shapiro v. Thompson

Nor can I understand the Court's implication, ante, at 638, n. 21, that other state residence requirements…

7 Citing Cases