Opinion
19-CV-61153-RAR
01-20-2022
DRONE NERDS FRANCHISING, LLC, Plaintiff, v. KRISS CHILDRESS, et al., Defendants. KRISS CHILDRESS, Counter-Plaintiff, v. DRONE NERDS FRANCHISING, LLC, Counter-Defendant. KRISS CHILDRESS, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. DRONE NERDS, INC., Third-Party Defendant.
ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
RODOLFO A. RUIZ II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon United States Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 121] (“Report”), entered on November 15, 2021. The Report recommends that the Court grant Impleader Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 111] (“Motion to Dismiss”). Report at 1. Counter-Plaintiff/Judgment Creditor filed objections to the Report on November 29, 2021, [ECF No. 123] (“Objections”), and the Impleader Defendant filed a Response in Opposition to Judgment-Creditor's Objections, [ECF No. 127] (“Response to Objections”), on December 8, 2021.
When a magistrate judge's “disposition” has been properly objected to, district courts must review the disposition de novo. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). Because Plaintiff timely filed objections to the Report, the Court has conducted a de novo review of Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss's legal and factual findings.
Having carefully reviewed the Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 111], Counter-Plaintiff/Judgment Creditor's Response in Opposition to Impleader Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 115], the Impleaded Defendant's Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 119], the Report, the Objections, the Response to Objections, the factual record, the applicable law, and being otherwise fully advised, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The Report [ECF No. 121] is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED.
2. Impleader Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 111] is GRANTED.
3. Accordingly, Counter-Plaintiff/Judgment Creditor's Impleader Complaint [ECF No. 98] is DISMISSED with prejudice .
DONE AND ORDERED.