From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Driver v. Kelso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 12, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-2397 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-2397 EFB P

09-12-2012

BILLY DRIVER, Plaintiff, v. J. CLARK KELSO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to plaintiff's consent. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; see also E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(4).

On August 9, 2012, the court dismissed plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim. The dismissal order explained the complaint's deficiencies, gave plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint correcting those deficiencies, and warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint would result in this action being dismissed for failure to state a claim. The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. Local Rule 110.

_________________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Driver v. Kelso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 12, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-2397 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2012)
Case details for

Driver v. Kelso

Case Details

Full title:BILLY DRIVER, Plaintiff, v. J. CLARK KELSO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 12, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-2397 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2012)

Citing Cases

Driver v. Rojas

• Driver v. Martel, No. 2:08-cv-1910 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sept. 16, 2009) (dismissed for failure to state a…

Driver v. Harber-Pickens

The Court finds that, prior to this date, Plaintiff had at least three cases dismissed that count as…