Drisdel v. State

Full title: Leonardo DRISDEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE .

Date published: Feb 7, 2017

509 S.W.3d 860 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

ED 103894

02-07-2017

Leonardo DRISDEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Kevin B. Gau, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Gregory L. Barnes, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Kevin B. Gau, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.Gregory L. Barnes, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Leonardo Drisdel appeals from a denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).