From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Driggs v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1902
72 App. Div. 632 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)

Opinion

May Term, 1902.


There being no appeal by the defendant, the question whether or not, under section 308 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the limit of $500 is intended to include all allowances for incidental expenses, etc., is not before the court. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred.


Summaries of

Driggs v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1902
72 App. Div. 632 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)
Case details for

Driggs v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:Edmund F. Driggs, Appellant, v. The City of New York, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1902

Citations

72 App. Div. 632 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)
76 N.Y.S. 1012

Citing Cases

Matter of Monfort

The cost of the survey and diagram in question comes strictly within the construction of the statute given in…