From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drenning v. Williams

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jun 18, 1973
480 F.2d 1220 (3d Cir. 1973)

Opinion

No. 72-1813.

Submitted Under Third Circuit Rule 12(6) May 14, 1973.

Decided June 18, 1973.

Joseph F. Ricchiuti, Liebert, Short, Fitzpatrick Lavin, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellants.

Steven R. Waxman, Bolger Picker, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

Before VAN DUSEN, GIBBONS and ROSENN, Circuit Judges.


OPINION OF THE COURT


This appeal challenges the July 5, 1972, order entering judgment n. o. v. in favor of the defendant truck driver in his claim for contribution from the third-party defendant automobile driver. The plaintiffs, passengers in the automobile, were injured when it collided with the defendant's disabled flatbed trailer which was blocking the westbound lane of the highway. According to the automobile driver's own testimony (95a-100a, 120a-123a), the truck was some 70-80 feet beyond a dip in the road; he first saw the truck in his headlights immediately upon coming out of the dip in the road (over the crest of the hill forming the western end of such dip), when he was about 60-65 feet from it; and because of his speed, about 50 to 55 miles per hour, he was unable to stop in time. As the district court opinion makes clear, driving at this speed under these circumstances violated Pa.Stat.Ann. tit. 75, § 1002(a), and, under the admitted facts, was negligence as a matter of law. See Drenning v. Williams, 344 F. Supp. 1365 (E.D.Pa. 1972), and cases cited therein.

The third-party defendant conceded that he saw the trailer as soon as he came over the crest of the dip without interference from darkness or any other factor.

75 P.S. § 1002(a) provides that "no person shall drive any vehicle, upon a highway . . . at a speed greater than will permit him to bring the vehicle to a stop within the assured clear distance ahead."

The discussion of the facts and cases in this district court opinion makes it unnecessary for us to elaborate upon them here.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.


Summaries of

Drenning v. Williams

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jun 18, 1973
480 F.2d 1220 (3d Cir. 1973)
Case details for

Drenning v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM J. DRENNING ET AL., v. JOHN H. WILLIAMS, APPELLEE, v. LAWRENCE F…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Jun 18, 1973

Citations

480 F.2d 1220 (3d Cir. 1973)

Citing Cases

Springer v. Luptowski

ned by storm, fog, a curve in the road or other conditions); Turner v. Smith, 237 Pa. Super. 161, 168, 346…

Spearing v. Starcher

If a fact finder determines that a driver has failed to operate his or her vehicle at a speed and with such…