From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drenckhahn v. Simmons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 26, 1991
172 A.D.2d 1080 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

April 26, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County, Hentel, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: In moving for summary judgment, defendants failed to negate the existence of a factual issue whether the injury or impairment prevented plaintiff from performing substantially all of his usual and customary daily activities for at least 90 of the first 180 days following the accident (see, Insurance Law § 5102 [d]). Summary judgment was, therefore, properly denied (cf., Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324).


Summaries of

Drenckhahn v. Simmons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 26, 1991
172 A.D.2d 1080 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Drenckhahn v. Simmons

Case Details

Full title:MITCHELL DRENCKHAHN, Respondent, v. HARRY SIMMONS et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 26, 1991

Citations

172 A.D.2d 1080 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)