From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dreher v. N.Y.C.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 25, 2014
115 A.D.3d 585 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-03-25

John E. DREHER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants. TDX Construction Corporation, Third–Party Plaintiff, v. Calcedo Construction Corporation, Third–Party Defendant–Appellant, Glass Solutions Unlimited Corp., Third–Party Defendant–Respondent. [And A Fourth–Party Action] John E. Dreher, Plaintiff–Appellant–Respondent, v. City of New York, et al., Defendants–Respondents–Appellants. TDX Construction Corporation, Third–Party Plaintiff–Respondent–Appellant, v. Calcedo Construction Corporation, et al., Third–Party Defendants–Respondents–Appellants. TDX Construction Corporation, Fourth–Party PlaintiffRespondent–Appellant, v. Kuritzky Glass Co., Inc., Fourth–Party DefendantRespondent–Appellant.


Appeals having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellants from ordersof the Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered on or about October 1, 2012, April 22, 2013 and June 24, 2013,

And said appeals having been withdrawn before argument by counsel for the respective parties; and upon the stipulation of the parties hereto dated February 28, 2014,

It is unanimously ordered that said appeals be and the same are hereby withdrawn in accordance with the terms of the aforesaid stipulation. GONZALEZ, P.J., MAZZARELLI, RENWICK, FEINMAN, GISCHE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dreher v. N.Y.C.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 25, 2014
115 A.D.3d 585 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Dreher v. N.Y.C.

Case Details

Full title:John E. DREHER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants. TDX…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 25, 2014

Citations

115 A.D.3d 585 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
115 A.D.3d 585
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 1981

Citing Cases

Kuligowski v. One Niagara, LLC

Contrary to defendants' contentions, we conclude that those Industrial Code provisions are sufficiently…