From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drake v. Hodgson

Supreme Court, New York Special Term
Sep 1, 1922
119 Misc. 288 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1922)

Opinion

September, 1922.

Goldman Unger, for plaintiff.

Walton, Bannister Hubbard, for defendant Hodgson.


Defendant Hodgson on or about June fifth obtained an order granting his motion for judgment on the pleadings dismissing the complaint, and plaintiff moves that judgment of dismissal, pursuant to the order, be entered by the defendant or by the clerk at the instance of the plaintiff. Defendant moves that the service of plaintiff's notice of motion be set aside on the ground that because of plaintiff's default in payment of the costs imposed by the order all plaintiff's proceedings are stayed by the statute. Civil Practice Act, § 1520. As plaintiff's motion is concededly but a step in an attempt to review the order, I think he has brought himself within the exception specified in the act, and defendant's motion to set aside is denied. Although plaintiff could have appealed from the order dismissing the complaint he did not take advantage of that privilege, and defendant urges that plaintiff's motion is solely for the purpose of enlarging his time to appeal and should, therefore, be denied. In Mitchell v. Dunmore Realty Co., 135 A.D. 583, it is held that a party may appeal from a judgment granted on the pleadings or from an order granting such judgment, or he may appeal from such judgment and include in the appeal the order for the judgment. Although in a case, as here, where the order dismisses the complaint, neither party may deem it necessary to enter formal judgment, as under our forms of procedure an action is determined by judgment, it seems to me that the unsuccessful party upon the default of the other party in that regard should be permitted to enter final judgment, thus completing the formal record of the action in the trial court. Wilson v. Simpson, 84 N.Y. 674. Defendant's motion to vacate denied. Plaintiff's motion granted to the extent of directing that unless final judgment be entered by defendant within ten days such judgment may be entered by plaintiff.

Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

Drake v. Hodgson

Supreme Court, New York Special Term
Sep 1, 1922
119 Misc. 288 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1922)
Case details for

Drake v. Hodgson

Case Details

Full title:FRANK DRAKE, Plaintiff, v . JOSEPH H. HODGSON and Others, Defendants

Court:Supreme Court, New York Special Term

Date published: Sep 1, 1922

Citations

119 Misc. 288 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1922)
196 N.Y.S. 319

Citing Cases

Reeck v. Royfe

The motion should have been granted. (See Wilson v. Simpson, 84 N.Y. 674; Drake v. Hodgson, 119 Misc. 288;…

Corash v. Texas Co.

Identical relief has been granted in similar situations. ( Strassburger v. Irving Trust Co., supra; Drake v.…