From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dozier v. Quest Diagnostics Incorporated

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 29, 2010
09 Cv. 9941 (BSJ) (JCF) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 29, 2010)

Opinion

09 Cv. 9941 (BSJ) (JCF).

December 29, 2010


Order


After having reviewed Magistrate Judge Francis's Report and Recommendation dated December 8, 2010, and having received no objections thereto, I hereby confirm and adopt the Report in its entirety, having been satisfied that there is no clear error on the face of the record. See King v. Greiner, No. 02 Civ. 5810 (DLC), 2009 WL 2001439, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. July 8, 2009) (citation omitted); see also Wilds v. United Parcel Serv., 262 F. Supp. 2d 163, 169 (S.D.N.Y. 2003). Accordingly, Respondent's motion to dismiss the Petition with prejudice is granted.

The parties' failure to file written objections precludes appellate review of this decision. See Caidor v. Onondaga County, 517 F.3d 601, 604 (2d Cir. 2008).

The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED:

Dated: New York, New York

December 29, 2010


Summaries of

Dozier v. Quest Diagnostics Incorporated

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 29, 2010
09 Cv. 9941 (BSJ) (JCF) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 29, 2010)
Case details for

Dozier v. Quest Diagnostics Incorporated

Case Details

Full title:SEMENTHE DOZIER, Plaintiff, v. QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INCORPORATED, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 29, 2010

Citations

09 Cv. 9941 (BSJ) (JCF) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 29, 2010)