From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doyle v. Seawall

Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1859
12 Cal. 425 (Cal. 1859)

Opinion

         Appeal from the County Court of Napa County.

         COUNSEL:

         Edgerton & Hopkins, for Appellant.

          J. Horrell, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: Field, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Baldwin, J., concurring.

         OPINION

          FIELD, Judge

         This case comes before us on appeal from the final judgment, and from the order denying a new trial. The statement upon which the appellant rests, is the one used upon the motion, and this is not agreed to by the parties or their counsel, or settled by the Judges who tried the case. It has not, therefore, sufficient authentication to constitute any portion of the record which we can notice. The appeal is based upon errors which the statement discloses, and as these cannot be considered, the judgment must be affirmed.

         Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

Doyle v. Seawall

Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1859
12 Cal. 425 (Cal. 1859)
Case details for

Doyle v. Seawall

Case Details

Full title:DOYLE v. SEAWALL

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jan 1, 1859

Citations

12 Cal. 425 (Cal. 1859)

Citing Cases

Spanagel v. Dellinger

And the same rule is mentioned by Mr. Justice Story, in the case of Albers v. Whitney, 1 Story 312.…

Keller v. Lewis

" When settled, the bill must be signed by the judge or referee, with his certificate,to the effect that the…