From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doyal Development Company, Inc. v. Blair

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 16, 1976
224 S.E.2d 55 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

51343.

ARGUED OCTOBER 7, 1975.

DECIDED JANUARY 16, 1976. REHEARING DENIED JANUARY 30, 1976.

Action for commission. Fulton Civil Court. Before Judge Bradford.

Rolader, Barham, Davis, Graham McEvoy, D. W. Rolader, for appellant.

McHaney Lynn, Robert L. McHaney, Jr., for appellee.


We have reviewed the record and the findings of fact and conclusions of law entered by the trial judge, and conclude that those findings and conclusions are amply supported by the evidence and are adequate to dispose of the issues raised below. This court will not disturb findings and conclusions that are not "clearly erroneous." CPA § 52 (a) (Code Ann. § 81A-152 (a)). See cases cited in Doyal Development Co. v. Blair, 133 Ga. App. 613 (2) ( 211 S.E.2d 642), reversed on other grounds in Doyal Development Co. v. Blair, 234 Ga. 261 ( 215 S.E.2d 471), vacated in Doyal Development Co. v. Blair, 135 Ga. App. 337 ( 217 S.E.2d 501).

Judgment affirmed. Bell, C. J., and Webb, J., concur.

ARGUED OCTOBER 7, 1975 — DECIDED JANUARY 16, 1976 — REHEARING DENIED JANUARY 30, 1976 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.


Summaries of

Doyal Development Company, Inc. v. Blair

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 16, 1976
224 S.E.2d 55 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

Doyal Development Company, Inc. v. Blair

Case Details

Full title:DOYAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. v. BLAIR

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jan 16, 1976

Citations

224 S.E.2d 55 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)
224 S.E.2d 55

Citing Cases

Yalanzon v. Sharon Construction Company, Inc.

The first three enumerations of error concern the court's findings of fact. An appellate court will not…

Johnson v. Scott

The appellant contends that the findings of fact were mere conclusions and are without evidence to support…