From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dowsey v. Village of Kensington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1928
222 App. Div. 831 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

January, 1928


Order denying plaintiff's motion to strike out separate defenses in amended answer reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that they are insufficient in law upon their face. ( Star Co. v. Brush, 185 App. Div. 261; Board of Education v. Van Zandt, 119 Misc. 124; affd., 204 App. Div. 856; 234 N.Y. 644.) Young, Hagarty and Seeger, JJ., concur; Kapper and Carswell, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.


Summaries of

Dowsey v. Village of Kensington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1928
222 App. Div. 831 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Dowsey v. Village of Kensington

Case Details

Full title:CORRIE M. DOWSEY, Appellant, v. VILLAGE OF KENSINGTON and Others…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1928

Citations

222 App. Div. 831 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)