Summary
observing that under New Jersey law, "a prejudgment assignment of part of the proceeds of a personal injury tort claim is void as a matter of law"
Summary of this case from In re RevissOpinion
Argued May 17, 1934 —
Decided September 27, 1934.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 112 N.J.L. 25.
For the respondent, Edward G. Burke.
For the appellant, Kellogg Chance.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, DEAR, JJ. 9.
For reversal — CASE, HETFIELD, WELLS, JJ. 3.