In Williams v. Downes, 30 Tex. 51, our Supreme Court held that the date of the service should be set out, in order that it may be seen that the defendant was served in statutory time before the convening of the court at which judgment by default was taken.
Summary of this case from Stephens v. AustinJune 9, 1944.
Present — Martin, P.J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
In Williams v. Downes, 30 Tex. 51, our Supreme Court held that the date of the service should be set out, in order that it may be seen that the defendant was served in statutory time before the convening of the court at which judgment by default was taken.
Summary of this case from Stephens v. AustinFull title:E. OLIN DOWNES, Respondent, v. WYTHE WILLIAMS, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Jun 9, 1944
Apart from that, however, this objection is obviated by the file mark of the clerk, showing that the citation…
Cox v. ThompsonAll of the conditions precedent to the issuance of the license having been shown to have been complied with,…