From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dounley v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Feb 23, 2010
Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-1388-O (N.D. Tex. Feb. 23, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-1388-O.

February 23, 2010


ORDER


After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the of the United States Magistrate Judge, I am of the opinion that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and are adopted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are adopted. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Application for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act is GRANTED, in part. Plaintiff is awarded attorney's fees in the amount of $11,901.73 and costs in the amount of $350.00.


Summaries of

Dounley v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Feb 23, 2010
Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-1388-O (N.D. Tex. Feb. 23, 2010)
Case details for

Dounley v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM EARL DOUNLEY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Feb 23, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-1388-O (N.D. Tex. Feb. 23, 2010)

Citing Cases

Hamblen v. Colvin

98–CV–1656–P (N.D.Tex. Mar. 24, 1999).See, e.g., Benton v. Astrue, No. 3:12–CV–0874–D, 2013 WL 818758, at *1…