From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Douglas v. Wilson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 18, 1985
472 So. 2d 876 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. BA-160.

July 18, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County; Harold R. Clark, Judge.

John A. Meadows of Wildt, Quesada, Walker Coker, Jacksonville, for appellants.

Carl Scott Schuler of S. Thompson Tygart, Jr., P.A., Jacksonville, for appellees.


Appellants appeal the trial court's judgment awarding appellees costs after appellants had voluntarily dismissed Count I of a two-count complaint without prejudice, pursuant to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.420(a)(1)(i). The trial court's order was rendered in response to appellees' motion to tax costs filed pursuant to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.420(d). We find no error in the amount of costs awarded and affirm that portion of the judgment appealed from. However, we agree with appellant Clarence B. Douglas that the trial court improperly rendered a joint judgment for costs as to Count I of the appellants' complaint, the count voluntarily dismissed before trial. Count I stated a cause of action by and in behalf of Nell Douglas only. See, Martel v. Carlson, 118 So.2d 592 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960), cert. den., 123 So.2d 674 (Fla. 1960). Accordingly, we vacate that portion of the judgment holding appellant Clarence B. Douglas liable for costs incurred in preparation for trial on Count I of the amended complaint. The remainder of the judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED as modified.

MILLS, SMITH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Douglas v. Wilson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 18, 1985
472 So. 2d 876 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Douglas v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE B. DOUGLAS AND NELL DOUGLAS, APPELLANTS, v. CHARLEENE LANCE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jul 18, 1985

Citations

472 So. 2d 876 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

Fischer v. Fischer

Our court and others have held that unless the claims are inextricably intertwined, costs should be properly…