From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Douglas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jun 11, 2014
140 So. 3d 691 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Summary

affirming judgment and sentence but remanding for correction of written sentence to match oral pronouncement

Summary of this case from Wilkerson v. State

Opinion

No. 1D13–0450.

2014-06-11

Dana Carl DOUGLAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County. James P. Nilon, Judge. Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant; Dana Carl Douglas, pro se, Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County. James P. Nilon, Judge.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant; Dana Carl Douglas, pro se, Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant's convictions and sentences in this Anders appeal, but remand for correction of the written judgment and the probationary order, which reflect that the trial court sentenced the appellant to 15 years' imprisonment to be followed by 10 years' probation for the second-degree felony of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon/actual possession. The sentencing hearing transcript indicates that the trial court orally imposed a sentence of 15 years' imprisonment for this offense, but no probation. It is a longstanding principle that a court's oral pronouncement controls over any written sentencing document. State v. Williams, 870 So.2d 207 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (citing Ashley v. State, 850 So.2d 1265, 1268 (Fla.2003)). The appellant does not need to be present for the correction of this clerical error. See Knight v. State, 114 So.3d 1067 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

AFFIRMED but REMANDED to correct the written sentence in the judgment and probationary order to reflect a 15–year prison sentence as to Count I.

BENTON, WETHERELL, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.




Summaries of

Douglas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jun 11, 2014
140 So. 3d 691 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

affirming judgment and sentence but remanding for correction of written sentence to match oral pronouncement

Summary of this case from Wilkerson v. State
Case details for

Douglas v. State

Case Details

Full title:Dana Carl DOUGLAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Jun 11, 2014

Citations

140 So. 3d 691 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Citing Cases

Wilkerson v. State

Croskey v. State, 71 So.3d 199 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (remanding for correction of erroneous written sentencing…