From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Douglas v. Faldoski

United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama
May 10, 2024
Civil Action 22-00079-CG-B (S.D. Ala. May. 10, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-00079-CG-B

05-10-2024

CLYDE EARNEST DOUGLAS, Plaintiff, v. DEPUTY KYLE FALDOSKI, Defendant.


ORDER

CALLIE V. S. GRANADE, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 49) made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant, Deputy Kyle Faldoski's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, that summary judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Faldoski, that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Faldoski are DISMISSED with prejudice, and that Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED in its entirety.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Douglas v. Faldoski

United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama
May 10, 2024
Civil Action 22-00079-CG-B (S.D. Ala. May. 10, 2024)
Case details for

Douglas v. Faldoski

Case Details

Full title:CLYDE EARNEST DOUGLAS, Plaintiff, v. DEPUTY KYLE FALDOSKI, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama

Date published: May 10, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 22-00079-CG-B (S.D. Ala. May. 10, 2024)

Citing Cases

Shadmani v. Barnes

Finally, as to Officer Barnes' drive stunning of Shadmani, “the use of a Taser in drivestun mode is generally…