From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doughty v. Maxwell

U.S.
Apr 22, 1963
372 U.S. 781 (1963)

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.

No. 516, Misc.

Decided April 22, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 173 Ohio St. 407, 183 N.E.2d 368.

Petitioner pro se.

Mark McElroy, Attorney General of Ohio, and James E. Rattan, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.


The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335.


Summaries of

Doughty v. Maxwell

U.S.
Apr 22, 1963
372 U.S. 781 (1963)
Case details for

Doughty v. Maxwell

Case Details

Full title:DOUGHTY v . MAXWELL, WARDEN

Court:U.S.

Date published: Apr 22, 1963

Citations

372 U.S. 781 (1963)
83 S. Ct. 1106

Citing Cases

United States v. Reincke

But when the same question was brought into sharp focus by the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit…

United States v. LaVallee

Doughty's petition for certiorari reached the Supreme Court after the decision in Gideon. In a brief per…