From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dougherty v. Heurich

Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia
Apr 7, 1930
40 F.2d 815 (D.C. Cir. 1930)

Opinion

No. 4950.

Argued March 7, 1930.

Decided April 7, 1930.

Appeal from the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia.

F.H. Stephens and V.E. West, both of Washington, D.C., for appellants.

Leon Tobriner, Byron U. Graham, and Walter N. Tobriner, all of Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.


This is a companion appeal to No. 4949, Dougherty et al. v. American Security Trust Company et al., this day decided, 59 App. D.C. 301, 40 F.2d 813, involving an assessment on the front foot basis of lands belonging to appellee abutting on Wisconsin avenue.

This case is in all particulars the parallel of No. 4949, just decided, and presents another vivid illustration of the impossibility of equitably applying the front foot rule in assessments of property abutting on the avenues of this city.

The decree is affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Dougherty v. Heurich

Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia
Apr 7, 1930
40 F.2d 815 (D.C. Cir. 1930)
Case details for

Dougherty v. Heurich

Case Details

Full title:Proctor L. DOUGHERTY, William B. Ladue, and Sidney F. Taliaferro…

Court:Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia

Date published: Apr 7, 1930

Citations

40 F.2d 815 (D.C. Cir. 1930)

Citing Cases

Willner v. Hazen

Notwithstanding, we said that before the rule could be applied, "there must be a relative equality in the…

Philadelphia, B. W.R.R. v. Hazen

72 levied against plaintiff's property as a result of the repaving of South Capitol Street in Washington,…