From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Double MK Farm v. Frelinghuysen Township

Tax Court of New Jersey
Jun 21, 1991
12 N.J. Tax 254 (Tax 1991)

Opinion

Submitted June 11, 1991.

Decided June 21, 1991.

Appeal from the Tax Court, Lasser, P.J.

Mainardi Mainardi, attorneys for appellant ( Andrew Mainardi, Jr., on the brief).

Courter, Kobert, Laufer, Purcell Cohen, attorneys for respondent ( Louis P. Rago on the brief).

Before Judges BAIME and ARNOLD M. STEIN.


The judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed essentially for the reasons expressed by Judge Lasser in his reported opinion. 11 N.J. Tax 6. Under certain circumstances, an assessor may reasonably anticipate that access to landlocked property can be obtained through an easement by necessity in determining the value of the property. Contrary to plaintiff's argument, the record discloses that this issue was fairly raised in the course of the trial. We discern no sound basis to disturb the judge's findings and conclusions pertaining to comparable sales.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Double MK Farm v. Frelinghuysen Township

Tax Court of New Jersey
Jun 21, 1991
12 N.J. Tax 254 (Tax 1991)
Case details for

Double MK Farm v. Frelinghuysen Township

Case Details

Full title:DOUBLE MK FARM, A NEW JERSEY PARTNERSHIP, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v…

Court:Tax Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jun 21, 1991

Citations

12 N.J. Tax 254 (Tax 1991)

Citing Cases

Acocella v. Cedar Grove Twp.

Where a landlocked property is said to have limited value compared to comparable parcels with access or road…

Acocella v. Cedar Grove Twp.

Where a landlocked property is said to have limited value compared to comparable parcels with access or road…