From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dorville Corporation v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1951
278 App. Div. 796 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

May 1, 1951.

Present — Peck, P.J., Dore, Cohn, Van Voorhis and McCurn, JJ.


Judgment reversed, with costs to the appellant, and the matter remitted to an Official Referee for determination of damages. The trial court's finding of breach of contract on the part of defendant was warranted and is affirmed. The measure of damages employed by the court, however, is unsupportable, and the cause must be remitted for an assessment of damages. Plaintiff's damage should be determined on the basis of defendant's profits on business solicited by him for himself during the period he was under contract to plaintiff. Any error in the computation of defendant's damages on his counterclaims can be corrected at the same time. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Dorville Corporation v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1951
278 App. Div. 796 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Dorville Corporation v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:DORVILLE CORPORATION, Respondent, v. JOHN E. JACKSON, Appellant, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 1, 1951

Citations

278 App. Div. 796 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Citing Cases

Epstein Eng'g, P.C. v. Cataldo

eturns, and granted plaintiff's cross motion for a corresponding protective order, unanimously affirmed, with…

Epstein Eng'g, P.C. v. Cataldo

the briefs, denied defendants Thomas Cataldo and Cataldo Engineering, P.C.'s motion to dismiss either the…