From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dorn v. Baker

Supreme Court of California
Dec 8, 1891
92 Cal. 194 (Cal. 1891)

Opinion

         Motion to dismiss an appeal from the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County.

         COUNSEL

          Graves & Graves, and Venable & Goodchild, for Appellants.

          F. A. Dorn, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: In Bank.

         OPINION

         THE COURT

         Motion to dismiss appeal upon the ground that the transcript was not filed in time.          The motion was submitted October 23, 1891, upon the certificate of the clerk of the court below, and affidavits made by attorneys of the respective parties.

         Subsequently, another motion was made to dismiss the same appeal upon the same ground. The last motion was orally argued before the court, and denied.

         This motion must therefore be denied, and it is so ordered.


Summaries of

Dorn v. Baker

Supreme Court of California
Dec 8, 1891
92 Cal. 194 (Cal. 1891)
Case details for

Dorn v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:N. A. DORN, Respondent, v. J. C. BAKER et al., Appellants

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Dec 8, 1891

Citations

92 Cal. 194 (Cal. 1891)
28 P. 225

Citing Cases

Weinburg v. Somps

People v. Sutton, 73 Cal. 248, 15 P. 86; Klockenbaum v. Pierson, 22 Cal. 160; Stoakes v. Monroe, 36 Cal. 384.…

Waer v. Waer

It was not solely impeaching, for it would have been admissible even if the plaintiff had not been a witness…