From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dorise v. Medina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Oct 20, 2011
DOCKET NO. 11-CV-928 (W.D. La. Oct. 20, 2011)

Opinion

DOCKET NO. 11-CV-928

10-20-2011

MIKHAEL CHARLES DORISE v. WARDEN MARIA MEDINA, ET AL.


SEC. P

JUDGE JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE JAMES D. KIRK

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after a de novo review of the record including the objections filed by the plaintiff, having determined that the findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that the petition in the captioned matter is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED at Alexandria, Louisiana, this 20th day of October , 2011

JAMES T. TRIMBLE , JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Dorise v. Medina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Oct 20, 2011
DOCKET NO. 11-CV-928 (W.D. La. Oct. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Dorise v. Medina

Case Details

Full title:MIKHAEL CHARLES DORISE v. WARDEN MARIA MEDINA, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Oct 20, 2011

Citations

DOCKET NO. 11-CV-928 (W.D. La. Oct. 20, 2011)

Citing Cases

Dorise v. Matevousian

More than 2 years later, on November 4, 2008, [Petitioner] filed a motion under § 2255 to vacate, set aside…