From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Donato v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 14, 2000
278 A.D.2d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

December 14, 2000.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

David Donato, Malone, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Alicia Ouellette of counsel), Albany, for respondents.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Spain and Carpinello, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

The detailed misbehavior report indicating that petitioner's urine twice tested positive for cannabinoids constitutes substantial evidence to support the finding that petitioner was guilty of using a controlled substance (see, Matter of Kussius v. Walker, 247 A.D.2d 911). The test documents attached to the misbehavior report establish the necessary chain of custody and proper foundation for reliance on the test results (see, Matter of Garcia v. Goord, 272 A.D.2d 694). The testimony of the author of the misbehavior report was not required (see, Matter of McMillan v. Goord, 252 A.D.2d 645), particularly in the absence of any request for witnesses by petitioner (see, Matter of Cowart v. Selsky, 260 A.D.2d 883). Petitioner's remaining arguments, including the claim of Hearing Officer bias, have been considered and are lacking in merit.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Donato v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 14, 2000
278 A.D.2d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Donato v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DAVID DONATO, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 14, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
719 N.Y.S.2d 130

Citing Cases

Tulloch v. Fischer

that he was denied the right to call witnesses. There is no indication that the requested inmates, including…

Rowe v. Goord

In this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge the determination finding him guilty of the drug use charge,…