From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Donald v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Apr 19, 1961
171 Tex. Crim. 60 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961)

Opinion

No. 33211.

April 19, 1961.

Appeal from the 69th Judicial District Court, Dallam County, Harry H. Schultz, J.

Jouette M. Bonner, Jacksboro, J. M. Donald, Bowie, for appellants.

Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


This is an appeal by J. M. Donald and W. W. Higgs, as sureties upon the bail bond of Billy Jack Higgs from a final judgment of the District Court of Dallam County forfeiting said bond.

The bond, dated July 23, 1959 in the penal sum of $500, was conditioned that the principal appear instanter before the District Court of Dallam County to answer a felony charge against him.

Judgment nisi was entered on March 8, 1960. Scire facias was duly issued and served upon appellants. After answer filed and hearing before the court, the judgment nisi was made final by order duly entered on December 16, 1960.

Appellants urged in the trial court and here contend that the district court was without jurisdiction on March 8, 1960 to declare a forfeiture of the bond because on such date the offense charged against the principal of willfully failing to support a minor child was a misdemeanor offense by reason of the amendment of art. 602, V.A.P.C., by the 56th Legislature. Acts 1959, 56th Leg., p. 504, ch. 222, § 1. With such contention we agree.

The indictment returned against the principal on March 14, 1958 charged that the offense was committed on or about July 17, 1957. At the time the offense was alleged to have been committed, the offense was a felony under the provisions of art. 602, supra. The amendment of art. 602, supra, reducing the offense to a misdemeanor and ameliorating the penalty became effective August 10, 1959.

Under the constitution and laws of this State, the district court is given original jurisdiction in all criminal cases of the grade of felony. Art. 5, Sec. 8, Vernon's Ann. Texas Const.; art. 54, V.A.C.C.P.

Original jurisdiction of all misdemeanors of which exclusive original jurisdiction is not given to the justice court, and when the fine to be imposed shall exceed $200, is conferred upon the county courts. Art. 5, Sec. 16, Vernon's Ann. Texas Const.; art. 56, V.A.C.C.P.

When the amendment of art. 602, supra, reducing the offense charged against the principal on the bond to a misdemeanor, became effective on August 10, 1959 the district court no longer had jurisdiction over the cause other than to transfer it to the proper court.

After the effective date of the amendment, it became the duty of the district court to transfer the cause to the County Court of Dallam County for trial in accordance with the provisions of art. 13, V.A.P.C., when punishment is ameliorated by a subsequent law. Fulton v. State, 116 Tex.Crim. R., 34 S.W.2d 281; Capehart v. State, 143 Tex.Crim. R., 158 S.W.2d 782; and Sheppard v. State, 145 TexCr.R. 99, 166 S.W.2d 346.

The district court, being without jurisdiction of the cause on March 8, 1960, the date the bond was declared forfeited, and without authority to required appearance of the principal on such date, was without jurisdiction to adjudge a forfeiture of the bond. 8 Tex.Jur.2d 187, Sec. 60; McGee v. State, 11 Tex. App. 520[ 11 Tex.Crim. 520]; and Morrow v. State, 86 Tex.Crim. 354, 216 S.W. 1100.

The judgment is reversed and the cause ordered dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

WOODLEY, P. J., absent.


Summaries of

Donald v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Apr 19, 1961
171 Tex. Crim. 60 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961)
Case details for

Donald v. State

Case Details

Full title:J. M. DONALD et al., Appellants, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Apr 19, 1961

Citations

171 Tex. Crim. 60 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961)
171 Tex. Crim. 60