Opinion
Argued March 10, 1881
Decided March 22, 1881
Nathaniel C. Moak for appellants.
S.H. Thayer for respondent.
ANDREWS, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Dollner v. Lintz
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 22, 1881
84 N.Y. 669 (N.Y. 1881)
Summaries of
Dollner v. Lintz
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 22, 1881
84 N.Y. 669 (N.Y. 1881)
Case details for
Dollner v. Lintz
Case Details
Full title:HAROLD DOLLNER et al., Appellants, v . WILLIAM LINTZ, Respondent
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Mar 22, 1881
Citations
84 N.Y. 669 (N.Y. 1881)
Citing Cases
Sturmwald v. Schreiber
And it must be borne in mind that the witness was called to attack, not to sustain, the credit of the…
People v. Provenzano, KonigsbergWe conclude that none of these determinations of the trial court requires reversal. Assuming Nadratowski's…