From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Dennis v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 11, 2007
36 A.D.3d 1064 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 98720.

January 11, 2007.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Dennis E. Hood, Beacon, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Peters, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ.


Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting harassment, threats, making false statements, and attempting to force others to engage in sexual acts after he wrote a sexually explicit letter to a correction counselor. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty as charged. The determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, although the penalty imposed was modified. This CPLR article 78 proceeding by petitioner ensued.

Substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt was presented in the form of the offending letter, exemplars of petitioner's handwriting, the misbehavior report and the testimony of the correction officer who authored it ( see Matter of Torres v Goord, 306 AD2d 592, 593, lv denied 100 NY2d 515; Matter of Rodriguez v Goord, 261 AD2d 740, 741, lv denied 93 NY2d 818). No expert witness testimony was required as hearing officers are permitted to independently assess handwriting samples ( see Matter of Johnson v Coombe, 271 AD2d 780, 780-781; Matter of Burgess v Goord, 269 AD2d 722, 722-723; Matter of Smith v Coughlin, 198 AD2d 726). Petitioner's claim that he did not write the offending letter created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see Matter of Torres v Goord, supra at 593).

Finally, petitioner's remaining claims regarding DNA tests relate to his 1988 criminal conviction and, thus, are not properly raised in this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In re Dennis v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 11, 2007
36 A.D.3d 1064 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

In re Dennis v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DENNIS E. HOOD, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 11, 2007

Citations

36 A.D.3d 1064 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 204
826 N.Y.S.2d 517

Citing Cases

Moore v. New York

We confirm. The misbehavior report, the hearing testimony of the correction officer who authored it and the…

Edward Koehl v. Brian Fischer

We confirm. The misbehavior report, the hearing testimony and the offending letter, along with exemplars of…