Opinion
CV423-287
12-04-2023
JANE DOE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EFFINGHAM HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION, INC. d/b/a EFFINGHAM HEALTH SYSTEM, Defendant.
ORDER
CHRISTOPHER L. RAY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.
The Court previously directed Defendant to show cause as to why its motion to dismiss, doc. 27, should not be dismissed as moot in light of Plaintiff's amended complaint. Doc. 40 at 2 (citing Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Tabby Place Homeowner's Ass'n., Inc., 637 F.Supp.3d 1342, 1348 n.4 (S.D. Ga. 2022)). Defendant has responded and conceded that its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, doc. 27, “should be dismissed solely on the ground that it is moot in light of Plaintiffs Jane Doe, Janet Roe, and Jane Smith's amended complaint.” Doc. 44 at 1. Given that express recognition, the Defendant's prior Motion to Dismiss is TERMINATED, as moot. Doc. 27.
SO ORDERED.