From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doe v. East Ramapo Central School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 5, 1999
260 A.D.2d 343 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

April 5, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Bergerman, J.).


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs to the plaintiffs.

The appellants' motion to further depose the plaintiffs regarding questions which were objected to at the plaintiffs' examinations before trial effectively constituted an application to review the propriety of certain questions propounded at those examinations. It is well settled that an order made upon such an application is not appealable as of right ( see, King v. Salvation Army, 240 A.D.2d 473; Smith v. Konica Bus. Machs., 232 A.D.2d 398; Cruz v. Roman Catholic Church for Most Holy Trinity, 222 A.D.2d 395). The appellants have not sought leave to appeal, and there is nothing in the record which would warrant granting leave to appeal on the Court's own motion. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. S. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Thompson and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Doe v. East Ramapo Central School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 5, 1999
260 A.D.2d 343 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Doe v. East Ramapo Central School District

Case Details

Full title:MARIE DOE, an Infant, by Her Father and Natural Guardian, JEAN DOE, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 5, 1999

Citations

260 A.D.2d 343 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
687 N.Y.S.2d 665

Citing Cases

Nappi v. University Hospital

Although Hall appeals from so much of the order as granted that branch of the plaintiffs' cross motion which…

Daniels v. Fairfield Presidential

The portion of the order appealed from which denied that branch of the defendants' motion which was to compel…