From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doe v. Boyertown Area Sch. Dist.

Supreme Court of the United States
May 28, 2019
139 S. Ct. 2636 (2019)

Summary

holding that a policy forcing transgender students to use separate single-user facilities "would very publicly brand all transgender students with a scarlet ‘T,’ and they should not have to endure that as the price of attending their public school"

Summary of this case from Grimm v. Gloucester Cnty. Sch. Bd.

Opinion

No. 18–658.

05-28-2019

Joel DOE, et al., petitioners, v. BOYERTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.


Motion of Ryan T. Anderson for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.


Summaries of

Doe v. Boyertown Area Sch. Dist.

Supreme Court of the United States
May 28, 2019
139 S. Ct. 2636 (2019)

holding that a policy forcing transgender students to use separate single-user facilities "would very publicly brand all transgender students with a scarlet ‘T,’ and they should not have to endure that as the price of attending their public school"

Summary of this case from Grimm v. Gloucester Cnty. Sch. Bd.

evaluating school district policy allowing students to use bathrooms and locker rooms corresponding to their gender identity instead of their sex

Summary of this case from United States v. Varner
Case details for

Doe v. Boyertown Area Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:Joel DOE, et al., petitioners, v. BOYERTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: May 28, 2019

Citations

139 S. Ct. 2636 (2019)
204 L. Ed. 2d 300

Citing Cases

Parents for Privacy v. Barr

For further support for the obvious distinction between Plaintiffs’ cited cases and the circumstances…

Adams v. Sch. Bd. of St. Johns Cnty.

As the District Court observed, no "scientific or medical definition" of "gender-fluid" exists in the record,…