From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dodini v. City of Fairfield

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 24, 2015
2:14-cv-02269-JAM-EFB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2015)

Opinion

          CENTER FOR DISABILITY ACCESS, Raymond G. Ballister, Jr., Phyl Grace, Esq., San Diego, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiff.

          Eugene B. Elliot, China M. Westfall, BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT, OSMAN & WENZEL, San Francisco, California, Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF FAIRFIELD.


          STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER

          JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

         COMES NOW Plaintiff VALERIE DODINI and Defendant CITY OF FAIRFIELD by and through their respective counsel who respectfully request and stipulate as follows:

         WHEREAS initial expert disclosures are due on October 16, 2015 and rebuttal expert disclosures are due on October 23, 2015;

         WHEREAS Plaintiff's expert's, Paul Bishop, is on vacation and unavailable the entire month of October;

         WHEREAS the parties have been engaged in settlement discussions and anticipate, and are working toward, resolution of the injunctive relief sought in this case;

         NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate that the deadline to designate experts is now November 16, 2015 and the deadline to designate rebuttal experts is now November 23, 2015.

          ORDER

         Pursuant to joint motion of the parties, and finding good cause therefore, this Court hereby orders that trial and case management deadlines scheduled in this matter shall be modified as follows:

• Expert witness disclosures: November 16, 2015

• Rebuttal expert witness disclosures: November 23, 2015

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dodini v. City of Fairfield

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 24, 2015
2:14-cv-02269-JAM-EFB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2015)
Case details for

Dodini v. City of Fairfield

Case Details

Full title:VALERIE DODINI, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF FAIRFIELD, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 24, 2015

Citations

2:14-cv-02269-JAM-EFB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2015)