From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dodenhoff v. United Fruit Co.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 14, 1947
74 F. Supp. 284 (S.D.N.Y. 1947)

Opinion

July 14, 1947.

Action by Betty Dodenhoff, administratrix ad prosequendum of the estate of John Dodenhoff, deceased, against the United Fruit Company, for injuries. On motion questioning court's jurisdiction.

Motion denied.

Nathan Baker, of Hoboken, N. J., for plaintiff.

Burlingham, Veeder, Clark Hupper, of New York City, for defendant.


The plaintiff is an alien, residing in Hoboken, New Jersey. The defendant is incorporated under the laws of the State of New Jersey. The injuries were sustained and the cause of action arose in Hoboken, New Jersey. It however appears by affidavit that defendant has obtained a certificate authorizing it to do business in this State and has designated an agent, upon whom process against it may be served, in this district. No facts as to inconvenience or otherwise have been presented which would justify the court to decline jurisdiction. See Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Corp., 308 U.S. 165, 60 S.Ct. 153, 84 L.Ed. 167, 128 A.L.R. 1437; Da Cunha v. Grasselli Chemical Co., D.C., 46 F. Supp. 28. The court still believes that the denial of the motion upon the argument was proper.


Summaries of

Dodenhoff v. United Fruit Co.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 14, 1947
74 F. Supp. 284 (S.D.N.Y. 1947)
Case details for

Dodenhoff v. United Fruit Co.

Case Details

Full title:DODENHOFF v. UNITED FRUIT CO

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 14, 1947

Citations

74 F. Supp. 284 (S.D.N.Y. 1947)

Citing Cases

The Anna Howard Shaw

It is at least clear that the objection to venue is well taken; and the libel against the United States must…

Rodinciuc v. United States

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; J. Cullen Ganey,…