From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dodds v. Corizon, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Nov 15, 2012
No. 5:11-cv-291-DPM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 15, 2012)

Opinion

No. 5:11-cv-291-DPM

11-15-2012

JOHN E. DODDS ADC# 132088 PLAINTIFF v. CORIZON, INC et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The Court has considered Magistrate Judge Beth Deere's partial recommended disposition, Document No. 113. No one has objected. Seeing no legal error or clear error of fact on the face of the record, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (Advisory Committee notes to 1983 addition), the Court adopts the proposal as its own. Dodds's claims against Simmons are dismissed without prejudice for lack of service.

So Ordered.

_______________

D.P. Marshall Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Dodds v. Corizon, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Nov 15, 2012
No. 5:11-cv-291-DPM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 15, 2012)
Case details for

Dodds v. Corizon, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN E. DODDS ADC# 132088 PLAINTIFF v. CORIZON, INC et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Nov 15, 2012

Citations

No. 5:11-cv-291-DPM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 15, 2012)