Summary
upholding a ban on most signs near interstate or federal-aid primary highways
Summary of this case from Rappa v. New Castle CountyOpinion
No. 87-722.
January 11, 1988.
ORDER
C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 827 F. 2d 1.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Dodd v. City of Norwich
U.S.
Jan 11, 1988
484 U.S. 1007 (1988)
Summaries of
Dodd v. City of Norwich
U.S.
Jan 11, 1988
484 U.S. 1007 (1988)
upholding a ban on most signs near interstate or federal-aid primary highways
Summary of this case from Rappa v. New Castle Countyreversing bankruptcy court ruling that disallowed a proof of claim based on a default judgment because default judgment is enforceable in New York
Summary of this case from In re AmanatCase details for
Dodd v. City of Norwich
Case Details
Full title:DODD, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF DODD v. CITY OF NORWICH ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jan 11, 1988
Citations
484 U.S. 1007 (1988)
Citing Cases
Rappa v. New Castle County
However, if we sever Subchapter I of Chapter 11, an individual will be able to post signs on a significant…
Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Finally, in the Fifth Circuit, "success on the merits does not . . . preclude" proof of a sham if the…